• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

WhatIsWeb20ToYou

This version was saved 17 years, 11 months ago View current version     Page history
Saved by PBworks
on April 22, 2006 at 12:24:56 pm
 

My notes on the discussion, not everyone agreed with all the points.

 

What does Web2.0 mean to you.

 

- 36 stuff and round corner

- less minutes of life wasted

- participation and interaction (integrate with other things such as media, mixed broadcast)

- community and the ability for people to share ideas in the same space

- media power to the people (grassroots)

- technologies behind it (ajax, tagging)

- big media advantages are loosing it (signal, mass readership)

- independtent media to get a signal and distrubute their content - opportunity to get a signal

- mashups - craigs list, googe maps and stuff

- elevate to a new level

- opening things up

- things, companies, technology more open

- empoering and easier to use

- renessaince of the web

- bull shit

- realizeation of what everyone talked about in the bubble

- no one making any money

- small companies that have popped up all over the place

- different approcate to entrepreneuship

- some doing just for technology

- some doing just to resell

(Flickr only Canadian site)

- some people go too far with web2.0

(e.g. uses RoR and ajax - doesn't nesseccarily mean you are cool)

- industry has had 15 years experience

- web2.0 is the evolution due to that experience

- what we have already been doing

- easier to use web pages, done in a new way

- many things attributed to this term

- just another over-hyped term

- some see web2.0 = RoR and AJAX

- but some see it as just part of it

- web2.0 age technologies

- interesting impacts that it has had on businesses

- inverting the structure of how things are monetized

- technology is a tool for allowing these things to occur

- Microsoft doesn't get web2.0 - they are not sharing

(for them to be cool they hve to give you new stuff)

- new business models based on advertizing (e.g. adsense)

- Adsense - hits the small companies

- the 95%

- doubleclick only got the 5%

- sometimes click on an ad just to support a web site

- ad support in models

- google is only one

- free411 (in the telephany space)

- listen to 20 second ad before talk to 411 operator

- google has done adsense very well

- people click on them because they are useful

- sometimes accidentally click on own ads since interesting

- ads - by topic

- where it is going to go - choose ads that you want on your site?

- recent development

- web sites under a certain banner - very selective on the ads that they run

- you have to approach them if you want to ad on their space

- have to look great

- compare to radio - ads are so horrible they are driving users away

Can Big Business Take Advantage of what web2.0 is

- yes

- when the realize the opportunity that will make them the most profit

- big media will jump all over this

- convey their message and understand the networks underneath

- sales force.com - accepted by most fortune 500

- how they reach and connect with their audience

- execs are blogging already with this form of media

- when will big business understand this media

- will blogs replace tradiational media

- no, because BBC has certain authority

- disagreement

- craigs list is affecting newspaper profits

- news on paper - too slow

- never seen kids read the paper

- just on the cust of this massive change

- kids don't listen to radio

- authority - some journalists transferring authority to web

- how can a blog ever replace international news

- big media doesn't own news, just distribute it

- media is embedding ads in the newspaper

- example - blog is syndicated with a newspaper - will appear a day after he posts it on the paper

- internet is just faster

- we assumed newspaper had authority, but they have been getting their info from random sournces

- except newspapers have fact checking

- not saying that CNN will be a blog in 5 years

- CNN will find a new way to deliver the news

- how will compete with Digg

- have correspondents all around the world

- CNN will be an aggregator

- media will become a filter to help highlight though the volume

- can put into stories context over time

- no blog will replace the economist (no one author)

- writter - editors - final writter

- erosion of trust of mainstream media

- newspapers pick and choose what goes in

- get two sides of the argument, which you don't in mainstream media

- see discrepancies between

- is media sitting around discussion "development" going away

- companies in Shanghai

- most people are using common bloggers- only some are using home-grown

- what if web3.0 is no more software developers

- talk to each other in a standard way - as a user I don't care how it works in behind

- does it work for the 10% that are using it

- still have a need for CNN, but can also create blogs for 100 readers

- getting rid of the layers

- whos taking the decision and who is the stakeholder

- Sympatico and Rogers are not worried - everyone is using them

- rogers doesn't want to be just a bit provider

- trying other things

- all other people that want just want them to be a bit provider

- look at what is going on in the voice industry

- metering minutes - but it isn't scarce anymore

- .0085 cents per minute

- price elastic

- what happens when price goes to 0

- bandwidth up

- revenue down

- have to realize that they have to take advantage of the long tail

- me and hardware store conversation is more important to the hardware store

- monitize things in context

- how long is it going to take for business to understand

- some of those businesses are going to die

- Bell laid of 4000 people in February

- if those economies die, then there are economies in other parts of the world that will kill us

- will manufacturing go there

- people will want to spend moeny on stuff that represents them?

- office with people in Sri Lanka - work for a quarter that we do

- we talk about making Toronto an international tech hub

- we talk about decentralizing content - but

- there are 11 or so root DNS servers - each house will have its own?

- google - who knows the actual algorithm of pageranking that google uses

- why don't we have a trust issue there, even though we do with Media

- we don't trust google to tell us the news

- but depend on them for our businesses

- trying to fool ourselves if we thing web2.0 is about decentralization of power

- web2.0 success on coattails of other companies

- same as 1995-1996

- amazon blew up the bookstore

- barnes and noble still sells more books than amazon - because location matters

- 800 pound gorilla is still there

- kids don't need to go to library anymore

- psychological - people are lazy

- don't have time to read all these blogs

- is the author Jewish, does that impact their opinion

- average person can't figure that out on everything they read

- mainstream - must smaller list to choose from

- feed fatigue

- whatever pops up on on main filter blogs

- still need some filter

- still read the paper

- reason why newspapers exist as a collective of aurhtors

- access to readership

- umbrella groups of blogs

- CIA finds blogs interesting - sucks it up and comes up with a position

- time for beer